One of the things that makes the therapeutic relationship unique is that it is one of the rare cases where the other person in the relationship will be honest with us about how our actions and our assumptions are affecting the relationship – without those things necessarily having to end the relationship – thus creating a safe place for us to experiment with new approaches to interpersonal relations.
Another unique aspect of the therapy relationship is the imbalance of power – in what other relationship is one party expected to divulge their most personal information while the other party reveals next to nothing of themselves?
The imbalance of power is something that creates its own set of uncomfortable issues for people on the client side of a therapy relationship – but these two aspects of the therapeutic relationship working together are also one of the factors that make therapy the powerful tool for learning and change that it can be – if we use it to best advantage.
Because the less we actually know about the therapist, the more we fill in the numerous blanks with our own expectations and projections and beliefs, casting the therapist in roles of our own choosing. Absent any real facts to the contrary, we tend to see in our therapists the characteristics of other important people in our lives, and we react to our therapists based on the assumptions connected to our pre-existing perspectives.
These assumptions can be positive or negative, but it is the negative assumptions that provide the most grist for the therapeutic mill, because by virtue of this process, we are effectively recreating some of our most problematic real-world relationships within the therapy relationship.
If we’re willing, we can then learn from this. We can learn to recognize how our history is affecting our current view of the therapist, we can learn to recognize other places in our lives where this same effect has occurred, we can learn how our actions and reactions in these situations are viewed by someone outside ourselves, and we can learn to separate past from present so that the first does not so automatically and pervasively affect the second.
This is probably not a new concept to anyone who has been in therapy – the concept of therapeutic transference is as old as Freud, and has been very thoroughly studied in the decades since. However, despite its familiarity, and although most people agree that the concept makes sense from a theoretical standpoint, it is still true that most people have great difficulty in actually applying the concept in their own therapy in order to benefit from the valuable learning opportunities it offers.
The problem is that, in order to achieve this learning, we first have to get past a lot of really sticky points. We have to get past the challenge to our immediate response, past feeling criticized and wanting to defend ourselves or “attack back” at the therapist. We have to get past taking it personally. We have resist the inclination to turn the issue back on the therapist, making it their fault and then letting the matter end there – and we have be willing to look honestly at ourselves.
We have to get past the desire to abandon the therapy relationship, even in those moments when it feels like our therapist is acting just like our mother / father / sibling / neighbor / whoever – we have to stick with it especially in those moments – because if we are seeing echoes of a figure from our own history in what our therapist is doing, it is an absolute guarantee that we are not seeing current reality clearly.
These are the moments when we can learn the most from therapy – the moments when our histories are creeping forward to cast their long shadows over our perceptions of a current situation, the moments when we can actively learn how to disentangle the one from the other.
Unfortunately, these are also the moments when many people tend to walk away from a therapy relationship in varying degrees of anger, disgust, resentment, or high dudgeon – at which point, all opportunity for learning has been cut short.
These issues which provide such valuable learning opportunities are invariably also charged with high emotional intensity, making it incredibly difficult for us to see anything but our current emotional upheaval. Each and every one of these opportunities is a struggle to overcome our natural responses and to really think about what our therapist is saying and how it applies to us.
To illustrate what I mean, consider this basic example –
Imagine that historically you have issues with your mother. When you were a child, she was cold, uncaring, and neglectful. She didn’t respond to your needs or give you loving and caring attention.
Years later, you begin to work with a female therapist. You initially perceive her as caring and attentive and insightful, all the things your mother never was for you and which you have grown up longing to have, so you feel an immediate bond with this therapist. You think she is wonderful and perfect and every good thing, subconsciously attributing to her all the characteristics of the ideal mother that you’ve always dreamed of having, and you want to feel close and connected to her at all times.
But then suddenly, for some reason, your therapist becomes less available to you. This can be due to something as simple as a vacation or a family crisis that results in a temporary absence, but it feels much bigger than that to you. It feels like all the times when you were left neglected and starved for maternal attention and affection. It feels like your therapist is acting just like your mother – and instantly you attach to your therapist all the negative feelings and beliefs and assumptions that connect to the “cold mother” image you have lived with all your life. Although you don’t realize it, you begin to respond to your therapist’s actions as if she were your mother. The therapist is now the target of the intense bitterness and anger and disappointment and hurt spawned by a lifetime of neglect and longing – your reaction makes sense to you, but it is also totally out of proportion to the reality that prompted it.
From this distance, it’s easy to see that this reaction isn’t really about what the therapist is doing – it is gaining all of its force and direction from the old unhealed wound of feeling unloved and unwanted as a child.
But if we were the person being swamped by these feelings, it would be a lot harder to realize how profoundly our current perceptions were being skewed by our historical experiences.
We might get as far as thinking “my therapist is acting like my mother” or “I feel just like I used to when my mother did this” – but in terms of resolving the problem, the historical implications are usually ignored.
The situation arose because of something the therapist did, an event which we are interpreting through a perspective tainted by history – but when it comes to resolution, the obvious point is that the therapist did something. So the initial stance for most people is that the issue at hand is the therapist’s fault, because they acted in a way that reminded us of our mother (or whoever) – although in fact, it is our own interpretation of the situation which is causing us to see our history recreated through the therapist’s actions.
It is the task of the therapist to help us see these flaws in our own perceptions and reactions – but not every client is willing or able to tolerate hearing that the flaw is on their side, when what they want is to blame it on the therapist and have the therapist be responsible for making whatever changes are necessary to repair the situation and prevent it from happening again (such as, in the above example, not going on vacation, or putting the client ahead of a family crisis).
Again – from this distance, it is easy to see that the client’s expectations and desires are unrealistic – but again, this is much harder to see when we are the one in the middle of the emotional distress. At such times, it can be difficult to fully appreciate that the only way our distress will actually be resolved is for us to address our own issues rather than to insist that the therapist (or anyone else) change what they’re doing for our comfort and convenience.
Until we address the flaws in our own perceptions, we will keep seeing our history recreated by the people around us, and nothing they do to appease us will ever succeed in resolving our problem.
But this is a difficult point to grasp. And as a result, it is at this juncture – when the client is experiencing the intense emotionality of their reaction and not receiving the response they desire from the therapist – that many therapeutic ruptures occur.
Because if we refuse to accept that our interpretations and reactions are the product of our own issues, if we insist that they are the fault of the therapist, and yet the therapist does not accept the excess of responsibility we are attempting to assign to them, then a termination of the therapeutic relationship is really the only recourse left to us. After all, how can we work with a therapist who is so unresponsive to our needs, so insensitive to our pain, so unwilling to accept responsibility, so defensive in making everything our fault when we know that everything is really their fault…
How many times have you heard that list of justifications to explain why someone has left therapy?
Therapeutic terminations occur as a result of this kind of circumstance all the time – and this is truly unfortunate, because not only are those who terminate therapy due to this kind of scenario dooming themselves to repeat the same scenario over and over forever (or until they finally realize where the actual problem is), but they are also missing the some of the most valuable learning that therapy can provide.
For those who are able to tolerate the emotional discomfort of these situations and actually look past it, the therapeutic relationship itself becomes a vehicle of deep learning and growth.
By learning where and how history is influencing our current perceptions, and learning to separate history from current day so that our feelings about the former do not inform and influence our every reaction in the latter – we are learning something from which every relationship in our life will benefit.
Like always, an excellent post but
Damn Rocker Girl….ouch…touche
This is one time that taking blame for
everything works for me…..It makes me
have to really think about what I am
feeling and what is going on. Maybe not
why it is there and where it comes from,
but at least nobody gets undue blame…
Comment by juliewtf — September 25, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
Hi Juliewtf –
Ouch indeed… believe me, I’ve learned this stuff the hard way!
But this is a little different than “taking all the blame” in any sense. I don’t intend it as an excuse for self-flagellation. Because it’s not really about blame at all, except insofar as it IS about not putting blame where it doesn’t belong — but really, what I meant was more the importance of recognizing the actual source of the problem, so that it can be resolved.
Self-blame is not going to help with that!
But neither will it help to blame everyone else for “causing us to feel this way” instead of looking honestly at why we interpreted a situation the way we did — and then just dealing with that.
We can’t assume that our own first reaction is always right, and then go overboard on supporting ourselves in that assumption. That can lead to us doing some really stupid and embarrassing things. I think we should spare ourselves that, if at all possible.
Comment by RockerGirl — September 25, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
Grist for the Therapeutic Mill. I like that. Throwing out the chaff. Being ground up to dust . The past between the stones forced to the outside and blown away by the winds of time, or sitting in a pile molding and rotting until the heat increases and the all goes up in flames though internal combustion.
We hate what we call “the transference thing.” Feeling things about our therapist that we know not to be true. We hug at the end of the session. Both sides left and right or else we list till we see here again. That ends the transference for us until next time.
We now start the transference by setting up our colored pencils. We do not always draw or color. It is kinda a ritual of starting. We don’t set up or colored pencils until business is all done like schedule and such.
My current therapist is the best I know at not engaging in my arguments. I pretty much just got worn out preparing for a battle for which she would not engage. We often tell her this would be easier if you were a jerk.
I now am transferring thing not only to my therapist but therapy. I was terrified to go to therapy today. Once I figured it out than it was gone.
I feel that much of my abuse the anger of the abusers directed at me, a transference of sorts. That makes it hard.
I flat out tell my therapist everything is her fault because it certainly is not mine. We both know what is going on.
Just a note that some therapeutic relationships should be terminated. A competent therapist will know this and transfer you to another therapist. Unfortunately it is the relationship with incompetent therapists that often should be terminated. Just a guess if you are thinking of terminating the therapist and not the relationship it might just be you.
Good post. I bet you are a handful for your therapist and very rewarding to work with.
Comment by MFF — September 25, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
I got that you meant recognizing
the source of the issues and not
automatically assuming that our
first reaction was the right
reaction.
I just feel because I am more apt
to take a situation, and place blame
it on my self. That it gives me time to
recognize where it is coming from. At
the general direction. And not assume
that it is the fault of the therapist
or whoever.
Comment by juliewtf — September 25, 2009 @ 3:55 pm
Hi Michael –
It sounds like you’ve worked out at least a tenuous coexistence with the transference thing, which is a triumph in and of itself. It really never is a comfortable thing, or at least I’ve never found it so. But the amount I’ve learned from my own reactions has… almost, sort of (not really but since it’s there anyway, let’s find the positive in it)… made it worth what I suffered to learn it.
Comment by RockerGirl — September 25, 2009 @ 4:39 pm
Hi juliewtf –
I think I’m following? There’s something still tugging the back of my mind, about the blame thing, but… it’s probably just sermonizing and (as we all know) there is no sermonizing allowed on Friday afternoons.
Just as long as you don’t get lost in the self-blame to the exclusion of being able to see past that, right?
Comment by RockerGirl — September 25, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I agree unequivocally that almost, sort of, not really, maybe in some way, I spose it is possible, who knows it has made it worth it to suffer what I learned.
Comment by MFF — September 26, 2009 @ 6:19 am
This is an interesting issue. I think that being able to look at and own our own projections is very valuable. And I would also say that it’s important to remember that the therapist is also quite human, and can show up with their own set of projections. Even the best therapist with the best boundaries and the best intentions may occasionally slip up. A therapist with lousy boundaries is another matter entirely. It can be hard to see clearly, under the influence of transference, what we as clients are bringing into the room and what the therapist may be bringing into the room. It’s always important to pay attention to your gut and speak up and not make assumptions either way. You never know what might really be going on. A good therapist will help you figure that out. A bad one will just leave you feeling more confused.
http://survivingtherapistabuse.wordpress.com/
Comment by Kristi — September 27, 2009 @ 7:52 pm
Hi Kristi –
Thanks for stopping by.
I agree that therapists with bad boundaries are a whole different subject, and obviously not one that this post even attempted to address.
As far as the subjects that were addressed in this post — the thing is, sometimes our “gut” is not the most reliable source of information. Our gut, after all, takes its lessons from experience and history — just as does every other human faculty for reading the situations in which we find ourselves.
If history and experience have taught us, even at gut level, to expect a certain thing from people, then we are likely to see it whether it’s there or not.
And if we are not willing to hear that anything about what we’re doing might be influenced by history, over-reactive and inappropriate to the current day situation, then odds are we’re going to feel confused (among other things) even if the therapist does try to help us work it out, because they won’t be saying what we want to hear.
But that isn’t the fault of the therapist’s bad boundaries, or anything else belonging to the therapist.
In my experience, people are far too prone to assume that things ARE the therapist’s fault when they are NOT — and there’s already plenty of information available about how terrible therapists can be — only some of which is valid, and much more of which is propagated by people who didn’t get what they wanted in therapy and think that’s the therapist’s fault — but all of which can be taken as encouragement by people who want to blame the therapist for everything.
A good client will actually learn from the opportunity to work things out with their therapist. A bad one will terminate therapy when it stops feeling like a perpetual head pat and claim that it’s the therapist’s fault.
Comment by RockerGirl — September 28, 2009 @ 9:50 am
What’s interesting to me is that therapists rarely, if ever, educate clients about transference. Perhaps fewer terminations would occur if the client were given direction as to what is going on, which doesn’t often seem to happen. Personally, I experience almost no transference with therapists, and never have, so it’s always absolutely baffling to me that therapy clients don’t “get” that feelings toward the therapist usually have nothing to do with the therapist (except in the case of genuine boundary issues, which are very easy to spot, as there’s a huge difference between a therapist being five minutes late to session, thus causing the client to feel “abandoned,” vs. the therapist saying “I think you’re dangerously insane.”).
Comment by davidrochester — October 8, 2009 @ 7:16 am
Interestingly, this is now the second comment in a row that has attempted to shift some of the responsibility for transference problems back onto the therapist. The first line here says “therapists rarely, if ever, educate clients about transference” — and goes on to say that it’s the therapist’s failure to educate which is largely responsible for transference-related terminations.
That’s a rather ironic trend, considering the topic of this post.
Maybe sometimes the therapists don’t explain enough.
Personally, I think it’s more often true that it doesn’t matter how much they explain, because the client just doesn’t want to hear it.
Explaining transference and projection doesn’t get very far with a client who absolutely refuses to hear that the problem is with their own interpretation — and there are a lot of clients who fall into that category.
You can’t educate those who refuse to be educated. And that’s not the therapist’s fault.
Comment by RockerGirl — October 9, 2009 @ 9:10 am
So — you don’t think that it’s possible for a client to be so profoundly confused and mired in their own stuff that they’re not going to “get” what’s going on unless the therapist provides some education?
Of course it’s not the therapist’s fault that some people refuse to be educated; it is, I believe, one of the therapist’s roles to provide education when they see patterns of behavior or reaction in a client that are clearly transference-related, if only because an intelligent client (and it’s quite possible to be both intelligent and extremely confused) will be able to pick up on that information and learn to see their reactions differently. But if a client does not know that transference exists, and if that client is already in a lot of pain and struggling to deal with it … I really do think that’s when the therapist needs to educate.
One of the things I do in my spare time is to run a private forum for therapy clients to give feedback and support to one another. One of the issues that comes up most often is unrecognized transference. The more therapy-educated clients on the board are continually pointing out transference, encouraging the client to stay in the relationship and mend ruptures, and most importantly, encouraging the client to bring it up with the therapist rather than terminating or permitting a sense of rupture to continue.
Incidentally, while I do think it’s a good idea for therapists to be more up-front and clear with clients about transference, and I think it would be even *more* helpful if this were addressed long before it happens and becomes problematic, I also said this:
it’s always absolutely baffling to me that therapy clients don’t “get” that feelings toward the therapist usually have nothing to do with the therapist
So I’m not “attempting to shift responsibility back onto the therapist.” What I’m saying is that I wonder why this (and many other things that therapists don’t seem to address up front to educate the client) doesn’t seem to be more often directly talked about as something to expect and be dealt with. This is a slightly different topic, but I tend to think that therapy would be more productive for both the therapist and the client if a clear set of “what to expect” information points were given to and discussed with the client prior to starting therapy. Transference should be on that list, as should the idea that at some point, therapy is usually destabilizing. I tend to think that a more up-front approach like this would weed out the clients who are incapable of learning, and would also weed out the ones who don’t have the guts or the persistence to make progress.
Comment by davidrochester — October 9, 2009 @ 9:42 am
I think it’s entirely possible for clients to fail to recognize transference when it happens.
But I also think it’s a mistake to assume that the failure to recognize transference is due to lack of education on the part of the therapist.
Taking the clients in your group as an example — just because they don’t recognize the transference doesn’t mean the therapist has failed to educate them about it.
It might mean they need to hear it fifty thousand times before it sinks in, and that’s going to happen a lot faster if they’re hearing it from other people in addition to the therapist.
Or it might mean that they can’t “hear” it from the therapist at all because the therapist is the person they’re trying to blame, so anything the therapist says about transference or projection sounds like defensiveness — but when their peers say it, it’s different.
It’s really impossible to compare what people do or how they react in a group of peers to what they do or how they react when they’re with their therapist, unless the point of the comparison is to show how different the two things are. So what you see in your peer support group doesn’t necessarily mean the education isn’t being offered by the therapist, it merely means it isn’t being taken from the therapist — those are two completely different things.
In short — how do you know that the therapist did not have that kind of “up front talk” with their clients? Is it an assumption just because the client acts surprised and confused when the transference or destabilization actually happens?
Because frankly, that’s hardly evidence that the education wasn’t offered. That’s just human nature. We hear risk warnings all the time, for all sorts of things, and we just ignore them. Taking aspirin. Swimming in a pool. Driving a car. Etcetera and etcetera. We ignore the warnings because we never really think it will be us who falls on the wrong side of the statistic — until suddenly, we’re on the wrong side of it. And then it’s all shock and reality checks and having to come to terms that the thing you thought would never happen to you has actually happened.
I think transference is a lot like that.
I have seen seven individual therapists over the course of my therapy career thus far — not the huge number that some people run through, but not completely insignificant either. These therapists have crossed three states and been in several different settings (hospital, private practice, group practice). I have never once not gotten the talk on what I can expect from therapy as part of my informed consent meeting — you know, that total waste of time at the beginning of therapy where you have to sign all the paperwork and it’s all official crap and people hardly ever listen to what the therapist is really saying — and then when the therapist asks if you have any questions or concerns, you say no, because you weren’t listening anyway.
And then, when therapy actually turns out to be destablizing and fraught with projections and transference and confusion, you’re surprised. And a lot of people at this point will blame the therapist and say they never told them it was going to be like this — when in fact, the warning was there, it’s just that nobody thought it would apply to them.
Regarding this: “I tend to think that a more up-front approach like this would weed out the clients who are incapable of learning, and would also weed out the ones who don’t have the guts or the persistence to make progress”…
I so wish I agreed…
But I think you’re giving people way more credit for self-awareness and honesty than they have proven to deserve.
Comment by RockerGirl — October 9, 2009 @ 10:18 am
No, it’s not just an assumption — I’ve asked. Granted, the clients may forget what the therapist says up front, and maybe I do give people too much credit for self-awareness and honesty.
But I also know this … I am a veteran of ten different therapists, and the only one who ever gave an “expectations” talk up front that involved negatives was the one I’m seeing now. Some of the others gave “orientation” stuff up front about their education and methodology, and the *results* they expected to achieve with me, but they did not address probable negatives, stumbling-blocks, or problems. I’m fairly sure I would remember if they had, because I was actually paying attention.
My mother, who is in therapy and is experiencing pretty severe negative transference, was also much amazed when I explained transference to her. Maybe she just wasn’t paying attention to the therapist, but she really reacted as though she had never heard of the concept in any form, ever, from anyone.
So — I don’t know. Perhaps our experience of how therapists orient clients has just been very different. My experience has been that expectation-setting has not involved explanation of transference, or even any mention of it. Even my current therapist didn’t do that; she warned me about destabilization, which I appreciated, and she warned me that we would probably have to try a number of modalities that wouldn’t work before we found one that did, which I also appreciated, as it pulled the teeth out of any tendency I might have to feel that I was “failing” at therapy rather than allowing us to figure out what would be a good fit. But transference and projection didn’t enter into the conversation. Maybe I’ll ask her why that was, the next time I see her … this has made me curious about what the usual protocol actually is, regarding transference and how it is, or isn’t, explained to clients prior to it happening, or while it’s happening.
Comment by davidrochester — October 9, 2009 @ 10:34 am
I guess we have had some pretty different experiences. I got this talk every single time — except the last time, when I cut it short by giving it myself.
I certainly can’t speak for what every therapist actually does, or even what most therapists actually do. My experiential knowledge is limited to what I’ve actually experienced. But having also been educated to become a therapist, I do know that we were taught that this information is supposed to be introduced in the first meeting or two, and then revisited as necessary over the course of therapy.
On the other hand, I suppose some people might choose to dispense with what they were taught when the time comes to actually put it all into practice.
Be that as it may, I can still speak only from my own experience. And that includes a multitude of examples of seeing how clients react to having transference and projection explained to them by the therapist as a way to interpret and understand their feelings and etcetera — both when they are in the midst of the transference reaction and when they are not. (That is, the client’s ability (or lack thereof) to accept the information is not uniformly dictated by the fact that the therapist has waited “too long” to explain it.) Although this occasionally proves effective, it is much more likely to go very badly. Many people just seem to have trouble accepting transference as an explanation when in comes to them this way, and they interpret it as something else.
According to my own observations, receiving the same explanation from peers tends to have much better odds of being heard as it was intended by the recipient — because peer relationship dynamics are dramatically different from therapist-client dynamics, and presumably whatever dynamic element makes it so difficult to accept this explanation from a therapist is not at play in the relationships with peers.
So I would be willing to agree that hearing the explanation from a peer might be the first time that the explanation of transference is heard and interpreted correctly, but my experiences make it impossible for me to agree that the education is not being offered to people by their therapists, because according to my experience, the education is being offered, and it’s the acceptance of the education that is lacking.
Comment by RockerGirl — October 9, 2009 @ 11:18 am