Rocking Complacency

April 2, 2009

Not Every Trigger Is About Programming

Triggers and programming.

Here’s the thing — the word “trigger” is not uniquely linked to abuse survivors who have been subjected to programming. It is a universal term for any stimulus that evokes the torrent of memories, physical feelings, and emotions of a trauma in its sufferer. Every PTSD sufferer has things that trigger them. This includes non-dissociative trauma survivors like war veterans, suvivors of a single adult rape, battered wives, and car accident victims — and it includes those who have suffered purely emotional traumas, such as a sudden death, a bitter divorce, or even a bad breakup.

Because what is perceived as traumatic is a purely subjective interpretation (i.e. what might traumatize one person might be taken in stride by another), it can fairly be said that every human being will suffer something they perceive as traumatic at some point in their life — which means that every single person we meet will have something that they perceive as a trigger.

It should therefore be obvious that a “trigger” does not necessarily point to programming. It does point to a perceived trauma of some sort, but not every trauma is caused by programming — not even for people who have been subjected to mind control techniques.

So it’s a little aggravating when “it’s programming” begins to be the refrain sung in response to every triggered response in a survivor’s life — especially when the responses being described have nothing at all to do with programming.

If programs were really being set off by every trigger to which that result is attributed, then the programmer had to be incredibly inept. Consider — how discreet would a real mind control program be if it could be set off by commercials on tv and random comments on the street? How controllable would a mind control program be if that were the case? And yet, the whole point of mind control is control. And it’s not control for any idiot who happens to say “ET phone home” or to make a commercial that happens to feature the concept of going home  — mind control programming is intended to give control to the programmers and only the programmers.

And no, the mind control groups are not infiltrating Hollywood studios or landing advertising accounts for major product lines so that they can manipulate the movies and tv shows and commercials with programming cues — if you believe this, then you are in desperate need of a reality check.

Believe me, the programmers do not have to go to such obscure lengths to reach the people they want. Such an idea is absolutely ludicrous. Why would they bother? If you are programmed and you haven’t done anything to address the programming, then they already know where you are and how to reach you. Someone in your system has already let them know those things.  And if they do still want you, then you probably aren’t nearly as far away from them as you want to think you are. They don’t need a cleverly constructed commercial to get to you. They have much easier — and more controlled — ways to do that.

Subsequently, no well-constructed program is going to be cued by what we see on tv or what the average person says to us or what we do in the humdrum routine of our everyday lives.

Programming is triggered only in response to something you have done (for example, don’t-tell programming), or in direct response to a cue from a programmer or a proxy for the programmer. Nothing else. And if it is being cued by a person, then it will require a very specific and very precise formula to cue it into action, something that isn’t going to happen just by chance. Some of these formulas are so complex and arcane that the programmers themselves need them written down in order to remember them from session to session.

The point is, the programmers do not want their programs being cued at any time except when the programs are intended to run. That is why programming doesn’t get triggered — it gets cued — and the nuanced difference there is intention.

I’m not certain why anyone would want to put more of their life, their responses, their behaviors, outside of their control than necessary — maybe it’s just a reflection of how out of control we can all feel at times — but it really doesn’t help us to start attributing more to programming than it fairly deserves. It doesn’t help us to throw away more control than necessary or to make the work of healing appear harder than it already is.

Mind control programming presents its own very difficult challenges to overcome — but triggers are a traumatic stress response, not a programmed response — and like the triggers created by any other type of trauma, our triggers are amenable to therapeutic intervention if we want to make a dedicated and consistent effort at working to defuse them.

9 Comments »

  1. i think there is room to allow for the possibility that abusers can create a powerful connection with a commonly come across thing in the media – say, ‘bugs bunny’ – that, when come across randomly, as one will run into reminders of bugs bunny relatively often – will trigger (or should i say CUE) programming (yes programming) to reinforce ‘remember to forget’ or ‘don’t talk’ programming, etc. it would be a reinforcer that would almost self-perpetually reinforce the message attached….. handy dandy… no need for the abuser to reinforce it, it will be reinforced on it’s own.

    Comment by thevaguecollective — April 4, 2009 @ 5:25 pm

  2. I agree, that possibility does exist. In fact, it’s more than a possibility — media figures are used in programming, as you obviously already know. But then I think you can probably also appreciate that programmers taking advantage of an existing figure (like Bugs Bunny or the Wizard of Oz or Mickey Mouse) is very different from those figures having been created by programmers specifically to be taken advantage of. The first is an abusive use of an otherwise innocent piece of media. The second is a conspiracy theory, and conspiracy theories are crap.

    And unfortunately — “self-reinforcing” programming doesn’t work quite the way you’re saying. Programming is not eternally self-reinforcing in that way. It degrades over time without maintenance. There are internal programmers who can do the maintenance to a certain extent, and there is tune-up programming to refresh the strength of the programs and make sure everything is still running as it was intended to do. Many people who think they’re free and clear are still getting tune-ups. A tune-up can take one night every six months, or every year, or even every 18 months — so infrequently that it’s not even registered as a problem, and it’s certainly not a reality that anyone wants to acknowledge — but it happens.

    In other words, “self-reinforcing” programs are still being maintained by a programmer. Or else they degrade, and then they are no longer effectively self-reinforcing programs.

    Comment by RockerGirl — April 4, 2009 @ 11:39 pm

  3. Thank you so much for writing this post!! As an SRA survivor, I get so tired of everyone assuming that every emotion, trigger, or response stems from programming. My entire identity is *not* wrapped up in that. It’s good to read someone else’s similar feelings on this issue.

    Cheers!

    Comment by englishrain — April 5, 2009 @ 7:14 pm

  4. Thanks for the post and your site. I just found it and look forward to reading. I think, maybe, there may be a communication issue. When someone immediately says “it’s programming” to a trigger, they may not mean programming the way you mean it. They may just mean “ingrained”. Something happens, you are triggered by it because the response is sort of encoded. So, the use of the word programming is passive. But I hear what you are saying. SRA/RA programming is something separate.

    Comment by mindparts — April 30, 2009 @ 8:57 pm

  5. Oh, by the way, love your fractal picture on the main page.

    Comment by mindparts — April 30, 2009 @ 8:58 pm

  6. Hi englishrain –

    Thanks for the comment!

    Yes, there is definitely always more to us than just the programming, and more to our responses than that as well. In fact, most of our responses and emotions are NOT affected by programming. It’s hard to feel like we are getting written off instead of taken seriously… I hear your frustration.

    Comment by RockerGirl — May 18, 2009 @ 11:36 am

  7. Hi mindparts –

    Thanks for the comment!

    Are you a fan of fractals too? We love those images… might be something interesting behind our interest…

    Comment by RockerGirl — May 18, 2009 @ 12:00 pm

  8. Yes, I’ve spent part of my science career working with fractals. Not the mathematical fractals you have on your site, which are all driven by equations, but what are called random fractals which are more based on how nature works to create them. Think things like snowflakes and coastlines. Paul.

    Comment by mindparts — May 18, 2009 @ 2:20 pm

  9. I have allays been on the outside of things with triggers. That somehow they are unique to trauma or those that are traumatized. For me it has always been the experiences that are the problem not the triggers. I have always gone with a trigger is a way to know there is something I have to work on. I did not always recognize them.

    The “access codes” that behavioral scientist believed were going to be able to used to control me whenever they wanted without constant maintenance and fear ended up as “triggers” for me.

    And I expanded them beyond the actual codes somehow and probably for some reason. The note G in a certain octave is a trigger so I expanded it to all notes in that octave. All bells no matter what the note became a trigger. Any letters and combination of capitals and lower case became a trigger. Any clicks became a trigger. Numbers are the worst for me.

    In a way as the “codes” denigrated they expanded. Might be a just happens thing or it might be a protection thing.

    I had much training with my memory and writing things down. I with many things have a seemingly sound reason for staying away from triggers. I only use a number 3 pencil as I press hard when writing not that I don’t want to use a number 2 pencil. I have no musical talent. Tapping activates me. I don’t do arithmetic I do math. I can not recognize why I do something and over time and hard work it goes away.

    Back t why I am outside on the trigger thing. The smell of chocolate chip cookies is a trigger. Triggers are natural it is the experience and that it is a secret that is not normal.

    Journey on,

    Michael

    Comment by MFF — June 14, 2009 @ 6:17 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Blog at WordPress.com.